top of page

When Visual Identity Becomes Verification

Verimark resolves identity directly from the physical object — not from links, lookups, or probability.

Deterministic, protocol-level identity verification embedded into the visual layer itself.

Explore deterministic visual identity integration in a controlled environment

barcode.png

READABLE IDENTITY

Barcodes & Serial numbers

  • Designed for visibility

  • No verification, only reference

  • Trust is external to the object

Link.png
LINK-BASED IDENTITY

QR codes & URLs

  • Identity resolved elsewhere

  • Copying the image reproduces the link

  • Trust lives in the redirect, not the object

OCR.png
PROBABILISTIC VISION

OCR & Pattern recognition

  • Identity inferred from visual similarity

  • Confidence degrades at scale

  • No deterministic ground truth

resized v.png

THE NEW MODEL

VERIFIED VISUAL IDENTITY
  • Identity bound to the physical object

  • Resolved at the protocol later

  • Copying does not reproduce identity

Why Determinism Matters in Visual Identity

Visual identity systems were designed to make objects readable — not to resolve identity with certainty.

As systems scale, automate, and operate at distance, visual similarity and probabilistic interpretation are no longer sufficient.


Identity must be resolved directly from the physical object — without reliance on proximity, probability, or external interpretation.

This is not about better scanning.
It is about changing the identity model itself.

Unclonable by Design

Copying does not reproduce identity

You can copy a Verimark code.

What you can't copy is the identity behind it.

A Verimark marker does not contain the identity itself.
Scanning initiates a protocol-level verification that resolves directly against Verimark’s system of record.

That verification returns a binary result: 

authentic or  compromised.

There is no redirect.

No best guess.

No interpretation layer.

Legacy visual systems embed resolution into the image.
Copy the image, and the function is copied with it.

The Verimark model is different.

With Verimark, identity is:

01

Bound to the physical object

02

Resolved by the protocol, not the image

03

Verified against a trusted system of record

If a copied image is scanned, it does not create a new valid instance.
It is evaluated, identified as a duplicate or anomaly, and rejected.

This is not about making codes harder to copy.
It is about ensuring that

copying does not reproduce trust.

Powered by Sodyo

Verimark applies Sodyo’s identity protocol specifically to brand and asset verification.

This page describes how the protocol behaves as Verimark — from physical embedding to binary authenticity verdicts.


The underlying identity engine, encoding architecture, and cross-industry identity framework are part of the Sodyo platform and documented separately.

Applied Across Critical Domains

The same identity system, applied to different operational realities.

Brand Protection

Authenticity for products and ownership

Enables verification at very small sizes, directly on the product — without impacting design, packaging, or brand experience.

Infrastructure Platforms

Identity embedded into systems and hardware

Designed for scale, automation, and reliability across platforms, devices, and global operations.

View Use Case

Defense Technologies

Identity for assets and critical components

Operates at distance, in motion, and across uncontrolled environments where ambiguity is unacceptable.

View Use Case
!
bottom of page